Re: pg_execute_from_file, patch v10

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Itagaki Takahiro
<itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 03:42, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> I think #2 might be a nice thing to have, but I'm not sure what it has
>>>> to do with extensions.
>>>
>>> Agreed.  There might be some use for #4 in connection with extensions,
>>> but I don't see that #2 is related.
>>>
>>> BTW, it appears to me that pg_read_file expects server encoding not
>>> client encoding.  Minor detail only, but let's be clear what it is
>>> we're talking about.
>
> EXTENSION will use #2 with convert_from() for $4 like this:
>
>  Datum sql = replace(
>                convert_from(pg_read_binary_file($path), $encoding),
>                '@extschema@', $schema);
>  SPI_exec(TextDatumGetCString(sql));
>
> I think it is a more flexible solution than adding 'encoding'
> parameter to pg_read_file().

It seems like pg_read_binary_file() is good to have regardless of
whatever else we decide to do here. Should we pull that part out and
commit it separately?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company