Re: patch: SQL/MED(FDW) DDL

On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> 2010/9/16 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>>> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>>> Yet there are other cases that probably *could* work well based on a
>>>> storage-level abstraction boundary; index-organized tables for instance.
>>>> So I think we need to have some realistic idea of what we want to
>>>> support and design an API accordingly, not hope that if we don't
>>>> know what we want we will somehow manage to pick an API that makes
>>>> all things possible.
>>>
>>> Agreed.  Random ideas: index-organized tables...
>>
>> I'd love to see a table that is based on one of the existing KVSs.
>
> I'm not familiar with the term KVS?

Oh, key-value store, I bet. Yeah, that would be cool.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company