From: | Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, SAKAMOTO Masahiko <sakamoto(dot)masahiko(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: patch: SQL/MED(FDW) DDL |
Date: | 2010-09-16 01:06:41 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTimVtwbjnRVWFJ0S_2SUjOq0hRjTb3UoFOA7f-sP@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2010/9/16 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> 2010/9/16 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>>>> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>>>> Yet there are other cases that probably *could* work well based on a
>>>>> storage-level abstraction boundary; index-organized tables for instance.
>>>>> So I think we need to have some realistic idea of what we want to
>>>>> support and design an API accordingly, not hope that if we don't
>>>>> know what we want we will somehow manage to pick an API that makes
>>>>> all things possible.
>>>>
>>>> Agreed. Random ideas: index-organized tables...
>>>
>>> I'd love to see a table that is based on one of the existing KVSs.
>>
>> I'm not familiar with the term KVS?
>
> Oh, key-value store, I bet. Yeah, that would be cool.
That's it. Like Redis, Tokyo Cabinet, or something.
--
Hitoshi Harada
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-09-16 01:16:15 | Re: RelationCreateStorage can orphan files |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-09-16 01:05:08 | Re: patch: SQL/MED(FDW) DDL |