Re: git: uh-oh

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Haggerty <mhagger(at)alum(dot)mit(dot)edu>, Max Bowsher <maxb(at)f2s(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: git: uh-oh
Date: 2010-09-07 14:08:04
Message-ID: AANLkTimiOascwkUzXFKZdLx_Lgny_Jm5ta0iw6N1MAeh@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> You're saying you don't "require" a fix on the latest issue here? Or
> should we spend some time trying to figure out if we can fix it with
> git-filter-branch?

I think that "the latest issue here" is the issue of how files get
added to branches, which we discussed before with pretty much the same
set of conclusions. I'm not wild about the way that's getting
converted, but I'm not sure I care enough about it to argue with Tom.
However, I want to convince myself that the deletes we've done over
the years have been properly handled. I need to look at Max's latest
conversion and I'll look at yours as well.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2010-09-07 14:11:09 Re: Fix for pg_upgrade's forcing pg_controldata into English
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2010-09-07 13:56:54 Re: git: uh-oh