Re: git: uh-oh

On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> You're saying you don't "require" a fix on the latest issue here? Or
>> should we spend some time trying to figure out if we can fix it with
>> git-filter-branch?
>
> I think that "the latest issue here" is the issue of how files get
> added to branches, which we discussed before with pretty much the same
> set of conclusions.  I'm not wild about the way that's getting
> converted, but I'm not sure I care enough about it to argue with Tom.
> However, I want to convince myself that the deletes we've done over
> the years have been properly handled.  I need to look at Max's latest
> conversion and I'll look at yours as well.

Magnus -

I just looked at your latest conversion (based on what Max did) and it
looks a lot better. I think, though, that we should re-remove these
branches:

origin/unlabeled-1.44.2
origin/unlabeled-1.51.2
origin/unlabeled-1.59.2
origin/unlabeled-1.87.2
origin/unlabeled-1.90.2

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company