From: | Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Per-column collation, the finale |
Date: | 2011-01-25 01:14:52 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTimTpruSy9XFye_8zJvHm3K=o6ah+GJ0y7w3nsBg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 06:41, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> I've been going over this patch with a fine-tooth comb for the last two
> weeks, fixed some small bugs, added comments, made initdb a little
> friendlier, but no substantial changes.
What can I do to test the patch?
No regression tests are included in it, and I have an almost empty
pg_collation catalog with it:
=# SELECT * FROM pg_collation;
collname | collnamespace | collencoding | collcollate | collctype
----------+---------------+--------------+-------------+-----------
default | 11 | 0 | |
(1 row)
--
Itagaki Takahiro
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2011-01-25 01:45:35 | Re: Change pg_last_xlog_receive_location not to move backwards |
Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2011-01-25 01:03:20 | Re: Re: patch: fix performance problems with repated decomprimation of varlena values in plpgsql |