Re: Per-column collation, the finale

From: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Per-column collation, the finale
Date: 2011-01-25 01:14:52
Message-ID: AANLkTimTpruSy9XFye_8zJvHm3K=o6ah+GJ0y7w3nsBg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 06:41, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> I've been going over this patch with a fine-tooth comb for the last two
> weeks, fixed some small bugs, added comments, made initdb a little
> friendlier, but no substantial changes.

What can I do to test the patch?
No regression tests are included in it, and I have an almost empty
pg_collation catalog with it:

=# SELECT * FROM pg_collation;
collname | collnamespace | collencoding | collcollate | collctype
----------+---------------+--------------+-------------+-----------
default | 11 | 0 | |
(1 row)

--
Itagaki Takahiro

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2011-01-25 01:45:35 Re: Change pg_last_xlog_receive_location not to move backwards
Previous Message Noah Misch 2011-01-25 01:03:20 Re: Re: patch: fix performance problems with repated decomprimation of varlena values in plpgsql