From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Per-column collation, the finale |
Date: | 2011-01-25 22:35:07 |
Message-ID: | 1295994907.6430.4.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On tis, 2011-01-25 at 10:14 +0900, Itagaki Takahiro wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 06:41, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> > I've been going over this patch with a fine-tooth comb for the last two
> > weeks, fixed some small bugs, added comments, made initdb a little
> > friendlier, but no substantial changes.
>
> What can I do to test the patch?
> No regression tests are included in it,
Please refer to the regress.sgml hunk about running the test.
> and I have an almost empty pg_collation catalog with it:
>
> =# SELECT * FROM pg_collation;
> collname | collnamespace | collencoding | collcollate | collctype
> ----------+---------------+--------------+-------------+-----------
> default | 11 | 0 | |
> (1 row)
The initdb output should say something about how it got there.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2011-01-25 22:43:36 | Re: Perl 5.12 complains about ecpg parser-hacking scripts |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-01-25 21:56:27 | Re: SSI patch version 14 |