Re: Per-column collation, the finale

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Per-column collation, the finale
Date: 2011-01-25 22:35:07
Message-ID: 1295994907.6430.4.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On tis, 2011-01-25 at 10:14 +0900, Itagaki Takahiro wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 06:41, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> > I've been going over this patch with a fine-tooth comb for the last two
> > weeks, fixed some small bugs, added comments, made initdb a little
> > friendlier, but no substantial changes.
>
> What can I do to test the patch?
> No regression tests are included in it,

Please refer to the regress.sgml hunk about running the test.

> and I have an almost empty pg_collation catalog with it:
>
> =# SELECT * FROM pg_collation;
> collname | collnamespace | collencoding | collcollate | collctype
> ----------+---------------+--------------+-------------+-----------
> default | 11 | 0 | |
> (1 row)

The initdb output should say something about how it got there.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2011-01-25 22:43:36 Re: Perl 5.12 complains about ecpg parser-hacking scripts
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2011-01-25 21:56:27 Re: SSI patch version 14