Re: Todays git migration results

On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 09:21, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 08:17, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> /me is very sorry master.  Please beat your unworthy servant only
>>>> lightly...  or alternatively, buy me a faster machine.
>>>
>>> Well, I might be able to afford a beer.
>>
>> Done!
>
> Well on 2nd thought, maybe not... If people start collecting I'll be
> broke (notably I owe tom quite a few :-).

Cheapskate.

> Anyway find below version that passes any arguments through to git-log.

Yeah, I don't think I want to go that route. Arbitrary user-specified
arguments to git-log might not be (probably aren't) sane in this
context, and there's also a chance that might want to have arguments
that are handled internally by the script, rather than passed through.
But I do agree that passing --since through is sensible.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company