| From: | Rob Wultsch <wultsch(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: profiling connection overhead |
| Date: | 2010-12-06 02:35:25 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTikqvpwp4FXsLU4xR93DFgV0ArtZd_fm=yAhn5jG@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Rob Wultsch <wultsch(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I think you have read a bit more into what I have said than is
>> correct. MySQL can deal with thousands of users and separate schemas
>> on commodity hardware. There are many design decisions (some
>> questionable) that have made MySQL much better in a shared hosting
>> environment than pg and I don't know where the grants system falls
>> into that.
>
> Objection: Vague.
>
I retract the remark, your honor.
At some point Hackers should look at pg vs MySQL multi tenantry but it
is way tangential today.
--
Rob Wultsch
wultsch(at)gmail(dot)com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-12-06 02:44:02 | Re: profiling connection overhead |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-12-06 02:27:58 | Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump |