From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Rob Wultsch <wultsch(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: profiling connection overhead |
Date: | 2010-12-06 02:44:02 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTi=BjRmBhAuSpPz-ATah9xNqjTrRE4ikL4TyV71Y@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Rob Wultsch <wultsch(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Rob Wultsch <wultsch(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> I think you have read a bit more into what I have said than is
>>> correct. MySQL can deal with thousands of users and separate schemas
>>> on commodity hardware. There are many design decisions (some
>>> questionable) that have made MySQL much better in a shared hosting
>>> environment than pg and I don't know where the grants system falls
>>> into that.
>>
>> Objection: Vague.
>
> I retract the remark, your honor.
Clarifying it would be fine, too... :-)
> At some point Hackers should look at pg vs MySQL multi tenantry but it
> is way tangential today.
My understanding is that our schemas work like MySQL databases; and
our databases are an even higher level of isolation. No?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Chernow | 2010-12-06 03:50:52 | Re: Suggesting a libpq addition |
Previous Message | Rob Wultsch | 2010-12-06 02:35:25 | Re: profiling connection overhead |