Re: profiling connection overhead

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Rob Wultsch <wultsch(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: profiling connection overhead
Date: 2010-12-06 02:44:02
Message-ID: AANLkTi=BjRmBhAuSpPz-ATah9xNqjTrRE4ikL4TyV71Y@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Rob Wultsch <wultsch(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Rob Wultsch <wultsch(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> I think you have read a bit more into what I have said than is
>>> correct.  MySQL can deal with thousands of users and separate schemas
>>> on commodity hardware. There are many design decisions (some
>>> questionable) that have made MySQL much better in a shared hosting
>>> environment than pg and I don't know where the grants system falls
>>> into that.
>>
>> Objection: Vague.
>
> I retract the remark, your honor.

Clarifying it would be fine, too... :-)

> At some point Hackers should look at pg vs MySQL multi tenantry but it
> is way tangential today.

My understanding is that our schemas work like MySQL databases; and
our databases are an even higher level of isolation. No?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Chernow 2010-12-06 03:50:52 Re: Suggesting a libpq addition
Previous Message Rob Wultsch 2010-12-06 02:35:25 Re: profiling connection overhead