Re: Instrument checkpoint sync calls

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Instrument checkpoint sync calls
Date: 2010-12-16 13:55:59
Message-ID: AANLkTiknFMzcMYqfHDxfCpYWkbTrr9mT+0yxt=FYA3Bc@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 6:48 AM, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I meant that I'd bundle it into the block of time I spend on that, and
> likely submit with something else that touches the same area.  Obviously the
> correction patch would be better on its own when being handed over to a
> committer.

Oh, that's very different. Never mind!

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-12-16 14:00:50 Re: Extensions, patch v18 (merge against master, bitrot-only-fixes)
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-12-16 13:52:33 Re: GiST insert algorithm rewrite