| From: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Instrument checkpoint sync calls |
| Date: | 2010-12-16 11:48:17 |
| Message-ID: | 4D09FC81.5080700@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> patch I submit. Doesn't seem worth going through the trouble of committing
>> that minor rework on its own, I'll slip it into the next useful thing that
>> touches this area I do. Thanks for the hint, this would work better than
>> what I did.
>>
>
> Well, if I'm the one committing it, I'll pull that part out again and
> commit it separately. Not sure if that affects your calculus, but I
> much prefer patches that don't try to do ancillary things along the
> way.
>
I meant that I'd bundle it into the block of time I spend on that, and
likely submit with something else that touches the same area. Obviously
the correction patch would be better on its own when being handed over
to a committer.
--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support www.2ndQuadrant.us
"PostgreSQL 9.0 High Performance": http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2010-12-16 12:21:42 | Re: proposal: auxiliary functions for record type |
| Previous Message | Florian Pflug | 2010-12-16 11:39:27 | Re: proposal: auxiliary functions for record type |