Re: PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag was incorrectly set in relation "pg_statistic"

From: bricklen <bricklen(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag was incorrectly set in relation "pg_statistic"
Date: 2011-02-01 16:16:07
Message-ID: AANLkTikW0SUJmv7MU1GjCK0D4Ddjyd0EuqAMvD=vSpJE@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 2:55 PM, bricklen <bricklen(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> We just had a slew of the following messages in our log. How concerned
> should I be at this point? I have no idea what triggered it.
>
> Version:
> PostgreSQL 9.0.2 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC gcc
> (GCC) 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-48), 64-bit
>
> 2011-01-31 14:16:13 PST [32767]: [1-1] (user=) (rhost=) WARNING:
> PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag was incorrectly set in relation "pg_statistic"
> page 22
...

Are there any other details I can provide to help diagnose this issue?
It is a production server, so I'd like to rule out the likelihood of
corruption etc if possible. There were about 3400 entries related to
that message yesterday, referencing two tables (pg_statistics and a
user table). The messages haven't reoccurred, and I've run a couple of
cluster-wide vacuum analyzes to see if I could shake anything else
out.

Cheers,

Bricklen

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dario Beraldi 2011-02-01 16:17:00 Re: Cluster table and order information
Previous Message Jeff Ross 2011-02-01 16:14:57 Re: Book recommendation?