| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: texteq/byteaeq: avoid detoast [REVIEW] |
| Date: | 2011-01-18 16:45:05 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTikM85u8v+ViscYVGPOiPpH69urs3v=2Y-NW1C_6@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> No, I don't think so. Has any evidence been submitted that that part of
>>> the patch is of benefit?
>
>> I think you might be mixing up what's actually in the patch with
>> another idea that was proposed but isn't actually in the patch. The
>> patch itself does nothing controversial.
>
> Oh, I misread Itagaki-san's comment to imply that that *was* in the
> patch. Maybe I should go read it.
Perhaps. :-)
While you're at it you might commit it. :-)
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-01-18 16:51:16 | Re: pg_filedump moved to pgfoundry |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-01-18 16:44:57 | Re: test_fsync open_sync test |