| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: texteq/byteaeq: avoid detoast [REVIEW] |
| Date: | 2011-01-18 16:44:16 |
| Message-ID: | 11705.1295369056@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> No, I don't think so. Has any evidence been submitted that that part of
>> the patch is of benefit?
> I think you might be mixing up what's actually in the patch with
> another idea that was proposed but isn't actually in the patch. The
> patch itself does nothing controversial.
Oh, I misread Itagaki-san's comment to imply that that *was* in the
patch. Maybe I should go read it.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-01-18 16:44:26 | Re: ToDo List Item - System Table Index Clustering |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-01-18 16:33:16 | Re: Replication logging |