Re: "writable CTEs"

From: Richard Broersma <richard(dot)broersma(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: "writable CTEs"
Date: 2010-12-22 18:50:58
Message-ID: AANLkTik65gnkt4gP8iGzNcP+ZFnw5iBf4Pqt=PwnVaoe@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Marko Tiikkaja
<marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi> wrote:
> I'd prefer something short but easily understandable, but those two might be
> mutually exclusive.

Volatile CTE's doesn't add any more clarity either. Maybe "Round Trip
Reduction" CTE's. :)

--
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2010-12-22 18:54:39 Re: "writable CTEs"
Previous Message Marko Tiikkaja 2010-12-22 18:44:12 Re: "writable CTEs"