Re: "writable CTEs"

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Marko Tiikkaja" <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: "writable CTEs"
Date: 2010-12-22 18:54:39
Message-ID: 4D11F50F0200002500038992@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi> wrote:

> I think I've used "DML WITH" in the patch, but I don't like that
> either. Naming this feature seems to be quite a challenge.
>
> I'd prefer something short but easily understandable, but those
> two might be mutually exclusive.

How about?:

DML CTEs
DML-based CTEs
RETURNING-based CTEs

-Kevin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2010-12-22 19:54:49 Re: "writable CTEs"
Previous Message Richard Broersma 2010-12-22 18:50:58 Re: "writable CTEs"