Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Mike Fowler <mike(at)mlfowler(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch
Date: 2010-08-06 20:52:17
Message-ID: AANLkTi=cDVUC3zxN3jpESO73Kr7TG=sXgbDYzo_5GBv9@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> yes it is one a possibility and probably best. The nice of this
> variant can be two forms like current variadic does -  foo(.., a :=
> 10, b := 10) or foo(.., variadic ARRAY[(a,10),(b,10)])
>
>
pardon foo(..., VARIADIC ARRAY[('a', 10), ('b' 10)])

regards

Pavel

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2010-08-06 20:52:36 Re: review: xml_is_well_formed
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2010-08-06 20:50:16 Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch