Re: review: xml_is_well_formed

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Mike Fowler <mike(at)mlfowler(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: review: xml_is_well_formed
Date: 2010-08-06 20:52:36
Message-ID: 1281127956.2563.5.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On fre, 2010-08-06 at 07:31 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > What about making the function sensitive to the XML OPTION, such
> that:
> >
> > test=# SET xmloption TO DOCUMENT;
> > SET
> > text=# SELECT xml_is_well_formed('foo');
> >
> > xml_is_well_formed
> > --------------------
> > f
> > (1 row)
>
> That will make using this function a huge hassle, won't it? Functions
> that do different things depending on GUC settings are usually
> troublesome. Having three functions would be more sensible if we need
> all three behaviors, but I don't see why we do.

Upthread you opined that this function should essentially indicate
whether a cast to type xml would succeed, and observing the xmloption is
an essential part of that. I had assumed the original patch actually
did that.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2010-08-06 20:55:06 Re: review: xml_is_well_formed
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2010-08-06 20:52:17 Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch