Re: Suggestion for aggregate function

From: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>
Cc: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)MIT(dot)EDU>, Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Suggestion for aggregate function
Date: 2003-01-18 00:08:06
Message-ID: 87fzrr1frt.fsf@stark.dyndns.tv
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at> writes:

> Greg, we already have this feature, just the syntax is a bit different :-)
>
> SELECT DISTINCT ON (item_id) item_id,
> price AS lowest_price,
> store_id AS lowest_price_store
> FROM items_for_sale
> WHERE item_category = ?
> ORDER BY item_id, price

Neat! I hadn't seen this. I would have liked to have had that feature on
Oracle! (Please don't tell me I did, I went through such pains to work around
not having it.)

Would this query be efficient if there's an index on item_id, price ? That is,
would it know to do an index scan and be able to skip to the next item_id in
the index as soon as a price was found?

--
greg

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jochem van Dieten 2003-01-18 00:48:58 Re: Win32 port (native)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-01-17 23:17:12 Re: Suggestion for aggregate function