Re: BugTracker

From: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BugTracker
Date: 2006-08-16 00:57:10
Message-ID: 87fyfx1ord.fsf@wolfe.cbbrowne.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

In an attempt to throw the authorities off his trail, ler(at)lerctr(dot)org ("Larry Rosenman") transmitted:
> I've used and use RT. It is web based for admin, but all the transactions
> are E-Mail based.
>
> http://www.bestpractical.com
>
> I can also make a test queue on my instance if someone wants to play.

We've got an RT system at work where some queues are set up to be
"sorta email manageable."

I see in their docs a "CommandByMail" extension that allows doing such
things via email request as:
- changing queue
- setting status, custom fields
- assigning owners, watchers, links

It's not self-evident what the security implications are; I'm not sure
how requests are authenticated.
--
(reverse (concatenate 'string "moc.liamg" "@" "enworbbc"))
http://linuxfinances.info/info/finances.html
As of next month, MACLISP "/" will be flushed in favor of "\".
Please update the WORLD.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2006-08-16 01:51:06 Re: An Idea for planner hints
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-08-16 00:31:20 Re: [PATCHES] Custom variable class segmentation fault