Re: An Idea for planner hints

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chris(dot)kingslynne(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
Cc: "Hannu Krosing" <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Perez <arturo(at)ethicist(dot)net>
Subject: Re: An Idea for planner hints
Date: 2006-08-16 01:51:06
Message-ID: 1acfe1a40608151851p110399f6mfc4e92c832c9adc7@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > > see. Collecting the statistics thereafter isn't that hard, but there
> > > needs to be a way to not collect an exponential volume of statistics on
> > > all column combinations.

You could collect them on all FK relationships - is that enough?

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2006-08-16 01:56:11 Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)
Previous Message Christopher Browne 2006-08-16 00:57:10 Re: BugTracker