Re: Turning recovery.conf into GUCs

From: Alex Shulgin <ash(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Turning recovery.conf into GUCs
Date: 2014-11-24 22:18:30
Message-ID: 878uj0p7ih.fsf@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>>>
>>> Before I go into my ideas, though, what does the current patch do
>>> regarding non-replication PITR?
>>
>> It removes that $PGDATA/standby.enable trigger file it relies on to
>> start the PITR in the first place.
>
> OK, and that's required for replication too? I'm OK with that if it
> gets the patch in.

In the current form of the patch, yes. Thought I don't think I like it.

--
Alex

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2014-11-24 22:19:53 Re: pg_background (and more parallelism infrastructure patches)
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2014-11-24 22:14:56 Re: Turning recovery.conf into GUCs