| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: info about patch: using parametrised query in psql |
| Date: | 2009-12-25 19:30:36 |
| Message-ID: | 8700.1261769436@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Works for me. One small problem discussed upthread is that there
> currently doesn't appear to be a libpq function that does
> ident-quoting. I'm thinking that we will need to add one to make this
> work - is that going to be a problem?
The rules for ident-quoting are simple and haven't changed over the
years, so we don't really *need* a libpq function for it. OTOH you
could argue it's inconsistent that we have one and not the other.
> I'm thinking that since we're
> just adding a function it won't force an uncomfortable major-version
> bump on libpq.
Yeah, we have taken the position in the past that adding new functions
doesn't require a soname bump.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-12-25 20:09:19 | PostgreSQL 8.5 Open Items |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-12-25 19:26:32 | Re: ORDER BY clause in aggregate doesn't work well with multi argument aggregates |