Re: info about patch: using parametrised query in psql

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: info about patch: using parametrised query in psql
Date: 2009-12-25 20:10:51
Message-ID: 603c8f070912251210w29331d30k2b3f9be120417d4f@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Works for me.  One small problem discussed upthread is that there
>> currently doesn't appear to be a libpq function that does
>> ident-quoting.  I'm thinking that we will need to add one to make this
>> work - is that going to be a problem?
>
> The rules for ident-quoting are simple and haven't changed over the
> years, so we don't really *need* a libpq function for it.  OTOH you
> could argue it's inconsistent that we have one and not the other.

Yeah. Plus it seems like a useful thing to have, anyway.

>> I'm thinking that since we're
>> just adding a function it won't force an uncomfortable major-version
>> bump on libpq.
>
> Yeah, we have taken the position in the past that adding new functions
> doesn't require a soname bump.

Good.

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tim Bunce 2009-12-25 20:16:02 Re: Initial refactoring of plperl.c - rebased [PATCH]
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-12-25 20:09:19 PostgreSQL 8.5 Open Items