| From: | Greg Stark <greg(dot)stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pavel Golub <pavel(at)gf(dot)microolap(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Named transaction |
| Date: | 2009-06-17 16:41:53 |
| Message-ID: | 86D5202D-611B-4F83-A9CE-F76F0BC60E16@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I'm curious what they ate too
--
Greg
On 17 Jun 2009, at 17:37, "David E. Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
wrote:
> On Jun 17, 2009, at 8:08 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> Pavel Golub <pavel(at)microolap(dot)com> writes:
>>> Is there any possibility that Postgres will have named transaction
>>> ever, like Firebird?
>>
>> What in heck is a named transaction, and why should we care?
>
> That Tom Lane, so warm and cuddly!
>
> David
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2009-06-17 16:45:48 | Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema |
| Previous Message | David E. Wheeler | 2009-06-17 16:37:46 | Re: Named transaction |