| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Stark <greg(dot)stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pavel Golub <pavel(at)gf(dot)microolap(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Named transaction |
| Date: | 2009-06-17 17:08:46 |
| Message-ID: | 603c8f070906171008t19057958o61bb7f600d5f669f@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Greg Stark<greg(dot)stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> On 17 Jun 2009, at 17:37, "David E. Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Jun 17, 2009, at 8:08 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Pavel Golub <pavel(at)microolap(dot)com> writes:
>>>> Is there any possibility that Postgres will have named transaction
>>>> ever, like Firebird?
>>> What in heck is a named transaction, and why should we care?
>> That Tom Lane, so warm and cuddly!
> I'm curious what they ate too
Shrooms?
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-06-17 17:27:20 | Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema |
| Previous Message | Petr Jelinek | 2009-06-17 16:52:37 | Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema |