| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>,Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>,Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>,Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>,YUriy Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>,pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics |
| Date: | 2016-03-02 05:09:58 |
| Message-ID: | 826FF98F-33D9-40A0-BACA-A096F882C1E0@anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On March 1, 2016 8:41:33 PM PST, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
>wrote:
>
>>
>> OK, I will test it, sometime in this week.
>>
>
>I have tested this patch in my laptop, and there i did not see any
>regression at 1 client
>
>Shared buffer 10GB, 5 mins run with pgbench, read-only test
>
> base patch
>run1 22187 24334
>run2 26288 27440
>run3 26306 27411
>
>
>May be in a day or 2 I will test it in the same machine where I
>reported
>the regression, and if regression is there I will check the instruction
>using Call grind.
Sounds like a ppc vs. x86 issue. The regression was on the former, right?
Andres
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2016-03-02 05:18:31 | Re: TAP / recovery-test fs-level backups, psql enhancements etc |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-03-02 05:06:52 | Re: TAP / recovery-test fs-level backups, psql enhancements etc |