| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Command Triggers, v16 |
| Date: | 2012-03-16 14:01:42 |
| Message-ID: | 7501.1331906502@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On Friday, March 16, 2012 02:50:55 PM Tom Lane wrote:
>> While I'm looking at the grammar ... it also seems like a serious
>> PITA from a maintenance standpoint that we're now going to have to
>> adjust the CREATE COMMAND TRIGGER productions every time somebody
>> thinks of a new SQL command.
> I don't find that argument really convincing.
Well, how about just plain parser size bloat? Did anyone look at
how much bigger gram.o becomes with this? Bigger parser -> slower,
for everybody, whether they care about this feature or not.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-03-16 14:08:07 | Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2012-03-16 13:57:24 | Re: Command Triggers, v16 |