Re: Command Triggers, v16

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Command Triggers, v16
Date: 2012-03-16 13:57:24
Message-ID: 201203161457.24614.andres@anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Friday, March 16, 2012 02:50:55 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> While I'm looking at the grammar ... it also seems like a serious
> PITA from a maintenance standpoint that we're now going to have to
> adjust the CREATE COMMAND TRIGGER productions every time somebody
> thinks of a new SQL command.
I don't find that argument really convincing. The current state of the patch
will often require attention to command triggers anyway...

Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-03-16 14:01:42 Re: Command Triggers, v16
Previous Message Shigeru Hanada 2012-03-16 13:51:57 Re: Proposal: Create index on foreign table