| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Grzegorz Jaskiewicz <gj(at)pointblue(dot)com(dot)pl>, Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Closing some 8.4 open items |
| Date: | 2009-04-11 20:30:02 |
| Message-ID: | 6700.1239481802@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> I assume the 'type' column will identify triggers, i/o functions
> (cstring), window functions, and maybe aggregates too; this solves
> several problems at once.
+1 for all except i/o functions. The cstring check for that was always
flat-out wrong, and getting it right is far more expensive than it's
worth --- AFAICS you'd have to grovel through all entries in pg_type.
But aggregates are only relevant if we decide to start showing
aggregates in \df --- is there consensus for that?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2009-04-11 20:36:22 | change oid of a pg_type |
| Previous Message | David Fetter | 2009-04-11 20:23:19 | Re: Closing some 8.4 open items |