| From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Grzegorz Jaskiewicz <gj(at)pointblue(dot)com(dot)pl>, Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Closing some 8.4 open items |
| Date: | 2009-04-11 20:43:35 |
| Message-ID: | 20090411204334.GA27499@fetter.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 04:30:02PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > I assume the 'type' column will identify triggers, i/o functions
> > (cstring), window functions, and maybe aggregates too; this solves
> > several problems at once.
>
> +1 for all except i/o functions. The cstring check for that was always
> flat-out wrong, and getting it right is far more expensive than it's
> worth --- AFAICS you'd have to grovel through all entries in pg_type.
I'll leave it out :)
> But aggregates are only relevant if we decide to start showing
> aggregates in \df --- is there consensus for that?
I'd throw 'em in.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-04-11 20:46:57 | Re: change oid of a pg_type |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2009-04-11 20:36:22 | change oid of a pg_type |