| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Hervé Piedvache <herve(at)elma(dot)fr>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Big trouble with memory !! |
| Date: | 2005-04-06 22:27:01 |
| Message-ID: | 6507.1112826421@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> Ok, I think the point I'm trying to make is that with "strict
> autocommit" in its current state isn't really that strict and just
> causes the problem to happen elsewhere.
Right, but that is surely just a kernel bug, and one that's not been
around very long. Presumably it'll be fixed soon.
> That formula they use is bizarre.
I presume that the point of the formula is that you want some fraction
of physical RAM to be reserved for disk buffers ... 50% might be
unreasonably high, or not ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Otto Blomqvist | 2005-04-06 22:31:45 | Re: [GENERAL] Problems with Set Returning Functions (SRFs) |
| Previous Message | Mage | 2005-04-06 22:26:10 | Re: lower function |