Re: next CommitFest

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: next CommitFest
Date: 2009-11-11 21:40:43
Message-ID: 603c8f070911111340n1f9116e0p6fd08c658ccb0412@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Jaime Casanova
<jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> wrote:
> why we need a full time manager at all?
> why not simply use -rrreviewers to track the status of a patch? of
> course, we hope the author or reviewer to change the status as
> appropiate but we have seen many people including missing discussions
> and changing the status of hanging patches...

Well, actually, that's precisely were I've been putting in a ton of
work - making sure patches aren't left hanging. If reviewers would do
more of that work, this process would run a lot smoother and be much
less onerous for the CM.

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2009-11-11 21:50:22 Re: Patch committers
Previous Message Joachim Wieland 2009-11-11 21:25:05 Listen / Notify rewrite