Re: next CommitFest

From: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: next CommitFest
Date: 2009-11-11 22:06:07
Message-ID: 3073cc9b0911111406i3099ade8sb0fe2e074b6e5dd9@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Jaime Casanova
> <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> wrote:
>> why we need a full time manager at all?
>> why not simply use -rrreviewers to track the status of a patch? of
>> course, we hope the author or reviewer to change the status as
>> appropiate but we have seen many people including missing discussions
>> and changing the status of hanging patches...
>
> Well, actually, that's precisely were I've been putting in a ton of
> work - making sure patches aren't left hanging.

that's why i guess sending automatic mails would be a good way to
remember that a reviewer had a patch in their control or to tell
reviewers/committers there are still patches for review/commit

--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2009-11-11 22:14:58 Re: next CommitFest
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2009-11-11 22:03:15 Re: next CommitFest