Re: Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2363)

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp
Subject: Re: Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2363)
Date: 2009-10-15 01:08:50
Message-ID: 603c8f070910141808r63d2a3e4m312aaa050450353d@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2009/10/13 KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>:
> The attached patch is a revised one with the following updates:

Despite two fairly explicit requests, this patch (and, with the
exception of ECPG, only this patch) has not yet been reviewed by a
committer.

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-10/msg00591.php
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-10/msg00652.php

Are any of the committers willing to take a look at this? Tom?
Alvaro, maybe? Bruce?

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Itagaki Takahiro 2009-10-15 01:19:15 Re: Buffer usage in EXPLAIN and pg_stat_statements (review)
Previous Message KaiGai Kohei 2009-10-15 01:06:46 Re: [PATCH] Largeobject access controls