| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch |
| Date: | 2009-01-16 17:56:57 |
| Message-ID: | 603c8f070901160956p5f2ad369u8f82a0aceb120b5c@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> One issue here is that plain \d gets less useful because it'll now
> include system catalogs. We could add the additional rule that
> the above statements apply only when a pattern is specified, and
> without a pattern you get just user stuff (so omitting a pattern
> corresponds to pattern "*" with the U modifier, not just "*").
> This would probably make it a bit easier to have exactly the same
> rules across the board.
Changing the scope of the search on the basis of whether or not a
pattern is present strikes me as a terrible idea. It's confusing and
unlikely to make anyone happy.
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-01-16 17:56:59 | Re: FATAL: could not open relation pg_tblspc/491086/467369/491103: No such file or directory |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-01-16 17:55:53 | Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch |