Re: 8.3 / 8.2.6 restore comparison

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Luke Lonergan <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.3 / 8.2.6 restore comparison
Date: 2008-02-23 19:29:30
Message-ID: 5484.1203794970@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> opreport -l /usr/bin/postgres
> CPU: AMD64 processors, speed 2411.14 MHz (estimated)
> Counted CPU_CLK_UNHALTED events (Cycles outside of halt state) with a
> unit mask of 0x00 (No unit mask) count 100000
> samples % symbol name
> 47654 15.5165 DoCopy
> 36231 11.7971 CopyReadLine
> 25046 8.1551 heap_formtuple
> 24137 7.8592 XLogInsert
> 13829 4.5028 InputFunctionCall
> 9618 3.1317 ParseDateTime
> 9521 3.1001 DecodeDateTime
> 9446 3.0757 pg_next_dst_boundary
> 7651 2.4912 DecodeDate
> 6948 2.2623 AllocSetAlloc
> 6290 2.0481 ExecConstraints
> 5462 1.7785 DecodeNumber
> 3287 1.0703 pg_atoi

Hmm, so what's the declaration of the table you're copying into?
Obviously there's some datetime column(s) in it ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-02-23 19:34:28 Re: 8.3 / 8.2.6 restore comparison
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-02-23 19:22:23 Re: 8.3 / 8.2.6 restore comparison