Re: 8.3 / 8.2.6 restore comparison

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Luke Lonergan <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.3 / 8.2.6 restore comparison
Date: 2008-02-23 19:34:28
Message-ID: 47C07544.6040203@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>> opreport -l /usr/bin/postgres
>> CPU: AMD64 processors, speed 2411.14 MHz (estimated)
>> Counted CPU_CLK_UNHALTED events (Cycles outside of halt state) with a
>> unit mask of 0x00 (No unit mask) count 100000
>> samples % symbol name
>> 47654 15.5165 DoCopy
>> 36231 11.7971 CopyReadLine
>> 25046 8.1551 heap_formtuple
>> 24137 7.8592 XLogInsert
>> 13829 4.5028 InputFunctionCall
>> 9618 3.1317 ParseDateTime
>> 9521 3.1001 DecodeDateTime
>> 9446 3.0757 pg_next_dst_boundary
>> 7651 2.4912 DecodeDate
>> 6948 2.2623 AllocSetAlloc
>> 6290 2.0481 ExecConstraints
>> 5462 1.7785 DecodeNumber
>> 3287 1.0703 pg_atoi
>
> Hmm, so what's the declaration of the table you're copying into?
> Obviously there's some datetime column(s) in it ...

Let me restart the load. I don't have any statement logging turned on.
However there is a likelyhood of multiple timestamps.

Joshua D. Drake

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-02-23 19:37:01 Re: 8.3 / 8.2.6 restore comparison
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-02-23 19:29:30 Re: 8.3 / 8.2.6 restore comparison