Re: pg_dump/pg_restore seem broken on hamerkop

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, buildfarm(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp
Subject: Re: pg_dump/pg_restore seem broken on hamerkop
Date: 2014-10-29 13:47:14
Message-ID: 5450EFE2.7070401@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 10/29/2014 12:26 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>>> [Some more code and git-log reading later] I see that the %z is a very
>>> recent addition: it only got there as of commit ad5d46a449, of September
>>> 5th ... and now I also see that hamerkop's last green run before the
>>> failure, on Oct 13rd, did *not* include the pg_upgrade check. So I'm
>>> thinking this was broken much earlier than 0eea804.
>> Ooohh ... you are right, the first failing build involved not only
>> the pg_dump refactoring commit, but an upgrade in the buildfarm script
>> that hamerkop was using (from 4.4 to 4.14). So it's entirely possible
>> this issue was already there and we just weren't seeing it tested.
> hamerkop is still failing in its runs done today. However, I'm not sure
> that that proves anything about our hoped-for fix, because the commit SHAs
> it's showing on the buildfarm status page are still from Oct 13. It looks
> like hamerkop has failed to pull any git updates since it was migrated to
> the new buildfarm script version.
>
>

This machine appears to be misconfigured for git. I will email the owner
about fixing it.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2014-10-29 14:08:50 Re: group locking: incomplete patch, just for discussion
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2014-10-29 13:04:23 Re: WITH CHECK and Column-Level Privileges