Re: WITH CHECK and Column-Level Privileges

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WITH CHECK and Column-Level Privileges
Date: 2014-10-29 13:04:23
Message-ID: 20141029130423.GF28859@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Robert Haas (robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> > suggestions. If the user does not have table-level SELECT rights,
> > they'll see for the "Failing row contains" case, they'll get:
> >
> > Failing row contains (col1, col2, col3) = (1, 2, 3).
> >
> > Or, if they have no access to any columns:
> >
> > Failing row contains () = ()
>
> I haven't looked at the code, but that sounds nice, except that if
> they have no access to any columns, I'd leave the message out
> altogether instead of emitting it with no useful content.

Alright, I can change things around to make that happen without too much
trouble.

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2014-10-29 13:47:14 Re: pg_dump/pg_restore seem broken on hamerkop
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2014-10-29 13:03:17 Re: Directory/File Access Permissions for COPY and Generic File Access Functions