Re: LIMIT for UPDATE and DELETE

From: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Rukh Meski <rukh(dot)meski(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: LIMIT for UPDATE and DELETE
Date: 2014-09-03 15:02:47
Message-ID: 54072D97.7040509@joh.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 9/3/14 4:46 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> Making it
> suck more because you don't think it's as important as your feature
> is, in my opinion, not cool.

I really can't see how that would make inheritance suck *more*. You
can't do UPDATE .. ORDER BY now, and you wouldn't be able to do it after
the patch. Yeah, sure, perhaps people using inheritance might feel left
out, but surely that would just motivate them to work on improving it.

.marko

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2014-09-03 15:05:15 Re: PL/pgSQL 2
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2014-09-03 15:01:12 Re: PL/pgSQL 2