| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jan Wieck <jan(at)wi3ck(dot)info>, PostgreSQL Mailing Lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PL/pgSQL 2 |
| Date: | 2014-09-03 15:01:12 |
| Message-ID: | 20140903150112.GE14893@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 08:46:36PM -0400, Christopher Browne wrote:
> 3. Is there anything to be learned from Tutorial D? That is, Date & Darwen's
> would-be alternative to SQL of their Third Manifesto?
What would a set-oriented-language PL look like, such as APL? I guess
Perl has arrays, so it is kind-of set-oriented.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marko Tiikkaja | 2014-09-03 15:02:47 | Re: LIMIT for UPDATE and DELETE |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2014-09-03 14:59:53 | Re: Inverse of pg_get_serial_sequence? |