| From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Denis Lussier <denis(dot)lussier(at)openscg(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Status of FDW pushdowns |
| Date: | 2013-12-03 03:15:36 |
| Message-ID: | 529D4CD8.5030307@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/28/2013 03:24 AM, David Fetter wrote:
> WITH, or SRF, or whatever, the point is that we need to be able to
> specify what we're sending--probably single opaque strings delimited
> just as we do other strings--and what we might get back--errors only,
> rows, [sets of] refcursors are the ones I can think of offhand.
So, you're thinking of something like:
WITH FOREIGN somecte AS $$... foreign query ...$$
SELECT ...
FROM somecte;
?
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Dunstan | 2013-12-03 03:17:11 | Re: Proposed feature: Selective Foreign Keys |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2013-12-03 03:02:36 | Re: Logging WAL when updating hintbit |