Re: GIN improvements part 1: additional information

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
To: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GIN improvements part 1: additional information
Date: 2013-11-26 21:14:46
Message-ID: 52950F46.2080009@vmware.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/26/13 15:34, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> What's your plans about GIN now? I tried to rebase packed posting lists
> with head. But I found that you've changed interface of placeToPage
> function. That's conflicts with packed posting lists, because
> dataPlaceToPageLeaf needs not only offset number to describe place to
> insert item pointer. Do you like to commit rework of handling GIN
> incomplete splits before?

Yeah, I'm planning to get back to this patch after committing the
incomplete splits patch. I think the refactoring of the WAL-logging that
I did in that patch will simplify this patch, too. I'll take a look at
Michael's latest comments on the incomplete splits patch tomorrow, so I
should get back to this on Thursday or Friday.

- Heikki

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2013-11-26 21:41:41 Re: INSERT...ON DUPLICATE KEY LOCK FOR UPDATE
Previous Message Rodolfo Campero 2013-11-26 21:12:00 Re: PL/Python: domain over array support