From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
Cc: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: additional json functionality |
Date: | 2013-11-17 23:20:45 |
Message-ID: | 52894F4D.2090800@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/17/2013 05:44 PM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> That would be one of the silliest and most short-sighted decisions we have
>> made in many years, IMNSHO. The demand for strong JSON support is enormous.
> One of the silliest and most short-sighted decisions we made recently
> might have been to actually ship that json variant in 9.2, after all.
The fact is that we had been going round and round on Json for a while,
and Robert Haas rightly made a move to break the Gordian knot. We would
not have done ourselves any service by not accepting it.
Hindsight is always 20-20, but even with what we have today people get
excited, and more people move to use Postgres every day because we have
that support.
>
> The most popular PostgreSQL commands in 9.4 are going to be:
>
> $ sudo apt-get install postgresql-contrib-9.4
>
> # create extension jstore;
> # alter table foo alter column documents type jstore;
> # create index on foo using gist(documents);
>
Umm, not if I have anything to do with it.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2013-11-18 01:49:18 | Re: additional json functionality |
Previous Message | Gavin Flower | 2013-11-17 22:48:45 | Re: additional json functionality |