Re: additional json functionality

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
Cc: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: additional json functionality
Date: 2013-11-17 23:20:45
Message-ID: 52894F4D.2090800@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 11/17/2013 05:44 PM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> That would be one of the silliest and most short-sighted decisions we have
>> made in many years, IMNSHO. The demand for strong JSON support is enormous.
> One of the silliest and most short-sighted decisions we made recently
> might have been to actually ship that json variant in 9.2, after all.

The fact is that we had been going round and round on Json for a while,
and Robert Haas rightly made a move to break the Gordian knot. We would
not have done ourselves any service by not accepting it.

Hindsight is always 20-20, but even with what we have today people get
excited, and more people move to use Postgres every day because we have
that support.

>
> The most popular PostgreSQL commands in 9.4 are going to be:
>
> $ sudo apt-get install postgresql-contrib-9.4
>
> # create extension jstore;
> # alter table foo alter column documents type jstore;
> # create index on foo using gist(documents);
>

Umm, not if I have anything to do with it.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2013-11-18 01:49:18 Re: additional json functionality
Previous Message Gavin Flower 2013-11-17 22:48:45 Re: additional json functionality