From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>, KONDO Mitsumasa <kondo(dot)mitsumasa(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Add min and max execute statement time in pg_stat_statement |
Date: | 2013-10-24 13:54:52 |
Message-ID: | 526926AC.9080404@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/23/2013 07:51 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>> So you're suggesting that instead of storing the aggregates as we
>> currently do, we store a buffer of the last N queries (in normal form)
>> and their stats? And then aggregate when the user asks for it?
> No, I'm not. I'm suggesting storing the query texts externally, in a
> file. They usually use 1024 bytes of shared memory per entry,
> regardless of how long the query text is. This would allow
> pg_stat_statements to store arbitrarily large query texts, while also
> giving us breathing room if we have ambitions around expanding what
> pg_stat_statements can (optionally) track.
>
> Having said that, I am still pretty sensitive to bloating pg_stat_statements.
>
Me too. I think min, max and stddev will have a fairly small impact, and
give considerable bang for the buck. Not so sure about the other
suggestions. And of course, memory impact is only half the story - CPU
cycles spent is the other part.
I'll be quite happy if we can get around the query text length limit. I
have greatly increased the buffer size at quite a few clients, in one
case where they run some pretty large auto-generated queries and have
memory to burn, up to 40k.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2013-10-24 14:19:27 | Re: proposal: lob conversion functionality |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-10-24 13:22:52 | Re: RULE regression test fragility? |