Re: logical changeset generation v6

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: logical changeset generation v6
Date: 2013-09-23 21:03:59
Message-ID: 5240ACBF.4010708@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 9/23/13 12:54 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> I still find it wierd/inconsistent to have:
> * pg_receivexlog
> * pg_recvlogical
> binaries, even from the same source directory. Why once "pg_recv" and
> once "pg_receive"?

It's consistent because they are the same length!

(Obviously, this would severely restrict future tool naming.)

In all seriousness, I like this naming best so far.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2013-09-23 21:26:42 Re: UTF8 national character data type support WIP patch and list of open issues.
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2013-09-23 20:51:24 Re: SSL renegotiation