| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: logical changeset generation v6 |
| Date: | 2013-09-23 16:54:46 |
| Message-ID: | 20130923165446.GD5284@awork2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2013-09-23 13:47:05 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Andres Freund escribió:
> > On 2013-09-20 14:15:23 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> > > I have a little bit of feedback that I forgot to mention in my earlier
> > > reviews, because I thought it was too trivial then: something about
> > > the name pg_receivellog annoys me in a way that the name
> > > pg_receivexlog does not. Specifically, it looks like someone meant to
> > > type pg_receivelog but fat-fingered it.
> >
> > Yes, you're not the first to dislike it (including me).
> >
> > pg_receivelogical? Protest now or forever hold your peace.
>
> I had proposed pg_recvlogical
I still find it wierd/inconsistent to have:
* pg_receivexlog
* pg_recvlogical
binaries, even from the same source directory. Why once "pg_recv" and
once "pg_receive"?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mitsumasa KONDO | 2013-09-23 16:55:41 | Re: gaussian distribution pgbench |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-09-23 16:47:05 | Re: logical changeset generation v6 |