| From: | Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Assertions in PL/PgSQL |
| Date: | 2013-09-19 12:28:31 |
| Message-ID: | 523AEDEF.1060007@joh.to |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 9/19/13 2:08 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> I think so similar frameworks will be exists (we have some similar
> Probably You and me have a same opinion so only simple and very primitive
> assert is not enough:
>
> I see as useful feature for assertions:
>
> a) possibility to specify a message (two parametric assert)
> b) possibility to specify some threshold
> c) possibility to specify some level (exception, warning, notice) ..
> default should be exception
> c) possibility to specify a handled/unhandled exception
I think these are all neat ideas on how to further improve this feature.
I'd like to see at least a) in 9.4, but I haven't yet looked at how it
could be implemented.
Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2013-09-19 12:33:22 | Re: record identical operator |
| Previous Message | Marko Tiikkaja | 2013-09-19 12:24:30 | Re: Assertions in PL/PgSQL |